![]() |
| Thanks to Clutch for posting |
Tuesday, May 22, 2012
D’Angelo Gives GQ His First Interview in 12 Years
Sunday, May 20, 2012
The social purpose of fiction versus non-fiction
![]() |
| Fiction versus nonfiction |
“The
imagination is in love with the feel of fact.” John Bailey
The other day, I was speaking with a
colleague about great works of contemporary fiction. The conversation was
sparked by my recent reading of Coetzee’s Disgrace. As I narrated the main points of the story, my
colleague’s expression morphed from one of interest to one of antipathy, and she stopped me mid-flow saying, ‘I wouldn’t read a book like that. Life
is hard enough without having to experience a more difficult existence in
fiction.’
She is a journalist. She is more
inclined to the hard facts of reality than the folly of fantasy. She argued that
non-fiction has a value and purpose. Fiction is ultimately entertainment. ‘At least with fiction you can put the book
down and console yourself with the fact that none of it is true,’ I reasoned. But she wasn’t
buying that.
We talked about examples of non-fiction that were harrowing in their depiction of the depravity of real life, much more so than any fiction could be because of the fact that it's true. I raised Roberto Saviano’s Gomorrah as an example (my colleague is Italian) which, from the opening passage, is a thoroughly disturbing yet utterly compelling description of the malignant force of the Italian mafia. So vivid is Saviano’s prose that reading Gomorrah is like watching a full colour documentary playing in the cinema of the mind:
Gomorrah, Ch. 1:
The container swayed as the crane hoisted it onto the ship. The spreader, which
hooks the container to the crane, was unable to control its movement, so it
seemed to float in the air. The hatches, which had been improperly closed,
suddenly sprang open, and dozens of bodies started raining down. They looked
like mannequins. But when they hit the ground, their heads split open, as if
their skulls were real. And they were. Men, women, even a few children, came
tumbling out of the container. All dead. Frozen, stacked one on top of another,
packed like sardines.
I also brought up Blaine Harden’s recently published Escape from Camp 14. The story of the first and only person to escape from a North Korean gulag is so distressing that a friend had to stop listening to the BBC Radio 4 Book of the Week after the first transmission.
Still, I could empathise with my
co-worker’s position. I used to be of the same opinion. I’ve never been a great
fan of fiction - until recently -for two reasons.
One, selfishly, is that I feared the
superiority of the writer and the power of his/her storytelling. For someone who
has long dreamed of being a published author, it was hard to read other’s work
without acknowledging the skill, craft and commitment required to deliver that
level of output without fearing that I would never be able to write as well as
the author in question. The art of fiction scared me.
Two, I’m a realist like my
colleague. Why lose yourself in fiction when you can engage in the living,
breathing world, in all its colour and complexity, equally intriguing, if not
more so, than anything the human imagination could create.In the past, when
reading fiction, there was always that nagging awareness at the back of my mind
that none of what I was reading was real so why bother? Needless to say, I’ve
never been a big movie fan either.
In regards to my first reason, I have
now overcome that anxiety. Through the formal study of non-fiction, I have
learnt to dissect the techniques that writers use that are essential to great
storytelling – pace, tension, dialogue and plot. It has become clear to me that
much contemporary non-fiction owes a debt to traditional fiction techniques,
most of which can be learnt.Capote famously cross-fertilised genres and employed
techniques from playwriting, reportage, short stories and novellas into his
non-fiction. In fact, much of the best contemporary literature is genre-bending. With good fiction,
you forget that you’re reading fantasy, perhaps because of the relevancy or urgency
of the prose, or the way it manages to capture the zeitgeist (e.g. Teju Cole’s
critically acclaimed Open City and
Rabih Alameddine’s difficult and chaotic Koolaids). The same can be said
of reading good non-fiction, written narratively and with such deep
characterisation that it reads like fiction. Sonia Faleiro’s Beautiful Thing and Amitav Ghosh’s In An Antique Land are good examples of non-fiction that transcends its genre and completely transports
the reader to another place, learning
without knowing it. The best non-fiction is subtle in tone, observed and written
with a good deal of authorial distance (excluding biography) and lets its
“characters” speak for themselves thereby allowing the reader to make up his or
her own mind without authorial intrusion. Conversely, the best fiction is often
purposefully provocative and political, deftly weaving in analytical elements
within the prose. Fiction has long had the power to
catalyse social and political change. We see in books from across time and
across continents that the pen is mightier than the sword. If this were not the
case, there would be no fatwa on Salman Rushdie, Nadine Gordimer’s books would not
have been banned, Chinua Achebe would not be an icon and the great Russian
writers would not be so lauded.
My second justification is also
easily dealt with. The reason why a writer with the intellectual and literary
ability of Orwell flitted between fiction and non-fiction is because it allowed
him the freedom to espouse ideas more freely and creatively – artistically – in a way that non-fiction
doesn’t.
Orwell, Why I write: “Animal Farm was the first book in which I tried, with full
consciousness of what I was doing, to fuse political purpose and artistic
purpose into one whole.”
What fiction does is to allow for the
malleability and rationalisation of fact into a story with the kind of meaning
and structure that real life doesn’t always allow for.The callous nature of
life and its randomness means non-fiction doesn’t always have a rational
ending; sometimes fiction does, restoring our belief in hope and the salvation
of human nature.
Not everyone can swallow the bitter
pill of reality. And for those who can’t, reading fiction is a way of engaging
with the real world through the hypothetical one. Even a purposefully political
writer like Orwell, who committed himself to making political writing into an
art form,chose the mode of fiction to communicate his ideas, perhaps for
reasons of accessibility.
The social value of fiction is that
offers:
- Escapism and a journey into the unknown
- Knowledge of other worlds, real and imagined
- Unpalatable truths in a palatable way.
In these difficult time, while some
are jettisoning their love of the make-believe for the instruction of
the real, I am finding that my understanding of the modern world is enriched
and enlightened by my reading of classic fiction- Steinbeck’s Travels with Charley and The Grapes of Wrath, Isherwood’s Goodbye to Berlin and Mr Norris Changes Trains and Sartre’s Roads to Freedom trilogy.It is
impossible to read any of these great works without feeling that the
characterisation and storytelling necessitates that, though fictional, they are
plainly based on the authentic.
My colleague’s preferred choice of
fiction is Audrey Niffenegger’s The Time
Traveller’s Wife. Fiction doesn’t have to be good (as in benevolent), it
just has to tell the truth, regardless of whether it offends our sensibilities.
If anything, fiction offers an opportunity to tell a truer version of the human
condition in all its intricacies and with all its vagaries. As Isherwood said, “…a
changeover from fact to fiction often begins with the weeding-out of
superfluous details.”
Saturday, May 19, 2012
This is Europe: dreams and deprivation
In
Brussels, otherwise known as “the capital of Europe,” the destitution I see on
a daily basis is unlike that I have seen anywhere else in the world. I’ve been
to “Africa” and visited many parts of Europe and America but Brussels is the
world in microcosm with all its associated poverty. In it, the complex convergence
of people and politics, of individual hopes and communal dreams has created a
city in which the recession’s collateral damage is concentrated in one,
miniature place. With Europe’s combined wealth, even in these hard times, there
is no excuse for the kind of poverty that has become an all too familiar sight
on Brussels’ well-trodden streets.
In 2012 I
bear witness to people who could have come straight out of a Walker Evans photograph.
Four characters, in particular, stay in my mind:
- The kneeling youth: a man in his mid-twenties, tall and thin, genuflects in the middle of the busy Boulevard Anspach holding a sign that simply says: J’ai faim. He is jostled by shoppers and their overstuffed bags, overlooked as if he is not there, but he is. Every day the same man in the same street with the same troubles. Still, dignified, desperate for help.
- The polio-ravaged woman: she hobbles agonisingly down the length of the street dragging one leg in front of the other in a spectacle of suffering. She is stooped and without a cane. She relies on her arm held against her good leg for support. Mothers steer their children away from the old woman as she approaches passers-by, cup in free hand, soliciting financial aid.
- The horrifically burnt wheelchair-bound man: the grotesqueness of his injuries frightens small children who can’t help but stare at his disfigured visage. He is curiously bewitching. He is a vivid personality, animated and smiling, his face taut with deep scarring. He has a regular spot opposite the kebab shop, which does brisk trade but he doesn’t. People would rather give to the man with the cute dogs in sunglasses begging down the road.
- The human-shaped blanket heap beneath the post office awnings: it varies in size and shape but the form is always human. They take turns in securing the coveted spot between the post office and the bus station. It is dry and private compared to the place around the corner, where a group of roughsleepers reside, conducting their ablutions in full view of passing traffic.
Some will
scoff at my characterisation of poverty in Brussels but I walk
around with my eyes open. You need only stroll through Gare Centrale or around Anspach
to see the levels of deprivation. The wilful blindness that many of us have
adopted does not make the problem disappear; it is still there, we just choose
not to see it.
Could it possibly be worse than that of a megacity like London? The answer is one of scale. Because of its size, everything is concentrated in a small space making things more exaggerated, less subtle and more in-your-face than in the expansiveness of London. I’m particularly talking about homelessness and, in this context, roughsleepers and beggars. Brussels has a seething undercurrent, one that threatens to short-circuit at any moment.
Could it possibly be worse than that of a megacity like London? The answer is one of scale. Because of its size, everything is concentrated in a small space making things more exaggerated, less subtle and more in-your-face than in the expansiveness of London. I’m particularly talking about homelessness and, in this context, roughsleepers and beggars. Brussels has a seething undercurrent, one that threatens to short-circuit at any moment.
In Brussels
circles I hear Africa derided with stunning regularity. I have even heard it
said that Europe’s problems are down to “Africans” not servicing “their debts.”
I will point out that:
- In “Africa” there is no social security but there is family.
- In “Africa” there is unemployment but there is community.
- In “Africa” there is material poverty but there is hope and it springs eternal.
- In “Africa” there are myriad problems but there is faith in the ability to overcome them.
In Europe,
we have all the opportunities but none of the corresponding responsibilities. Which
of these – family, community, hope and faith - can Europe claim to have at this
critical moment in our history?
Brussels,
like Europe, is coming apart at the seams. The fabric of a patchwork society is
under intense strain, not just from the economic crisis but from a fundamental
crisis of belief in politics to change things, and in self. The sooner we own up
to this and do something about it, the better for everyone, especially the most
poor.
Labels:
Europe,
Talk/Discuss
Friday, May 18, 2012
Timeless books from a modern brand
Granta books are like D’Angelo LPs: I would buy one without having heard a single
track or, in this context, without having read a single word. Brands in
publishing are a dying breed. The days of the Penguin paperbacks belong to a
bygone age. Yes, there is the Modern Classics series and the Vintage Classics
but for contemporary literature i.e. in the last ten to fifteen years, guaranteed
to stand the test of time – fiction and non-fiction –you can’t beat a Granta release.
Recently, I’ve bought three for no other reason than they were published by
Granta and my faith in the brand was handsomely rewarded.
In the last
month, Amitav Ghosh’s In An Antique Land,
Sven Lindqvist’s Saharan Journey and Noo Saro-Wiwa’s Looking for Transwonderland have educated, entertained and enchanted me. Barbara Ehrenreich’s Nickel and Dimed has enraged me and Craig
Taylor’s Londoners has made me see my
home city in a whole new light. What more could you ask from a publishing house
and its authors?
This was
the first time I had read any of these writers. Thanks to Granta, it won’t be
the last.
Thursday, May 17, 2012
At last! New literature from Ghana
Finally,
a book out of Ghana that’s eliciting the kind of excitement usually reserved
for Nigerian writers! I’m so looking forward to getting my hands on a copy of
John Dramani Mahama’s new collection of autobiographical essays, My First Coup d’Etat:And Other True Stories from the Lost Decades of Africa. Published by
Bloomsbury in July, the book is said to tell Ghana’s post-colonial history through
the prism of Dramani’s life and experience using traditional African
storytelling techniques in the form of fables.
With a
foreword by Chinua Achebe, My First Coup
d’Etat will hopefully become a welcome addition to the African literary
cannon. My one reservation is not about the book itself. It’s about the fact
that Ghana still has yet to bring forward a young literary voice to stand next
to the likes of Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie and others who are writing about the
African conditions now as opposed to fifty years ago. I fear that our culture
of deference to our elders may play a part in stifling this voice but I
continue to live in hope that Ghana will produce a new literary talent of world
renown.
In the
meantime, read the blurb below for a taste of what’s to come from Dramani
Mahama:
Book Description
Publication Date: July 3, 2012
My First Coup d’Etat chronicles the
coming-of-age of John Dramani Mahama in Ghana during the dismal post-independence
"lost decades" of Africa. He was seven years old when rumors of a
coup reached his boarding school in Accra. His father, a minister of state, was
suddenly missing, then imprisoned for more than a year.
My First Coup d’Etat offers a look at the
country that has long been considered Africa’s success story. This is a
one-of-a-kind book: Mahama’s is a rare literary voice from a political leader,
and his personal stories work on many levels—as fables, as history, as cultural
and political analyses, and, of course, as the memoir of a young man who,
unbeknownst to him or anyone else, would grow up to be vice president of his
nation. Though nonfiction, these are stories that rise above their specific
settings and transport the reader—much like the fiction of Isaac Bashevis
Singer and Nadine Gordimer—into a world all their own, one which straddles a
time lost and explores the universal human emotions of love, fear, faith,
despair, loss, longing, and hope despite all else.
Review
"With crisp yet sweeping
prose, John Mahama’s memoir, My First Coup d’Etat, provides
insights into Ghana’s, and by extension, Africa’s struggle to weather its
historical burden and engage with a world much removed from her dilemma.
Without sentimentality or condescension, he exposes homegrown African
pathologies and helps us understand several contradictions of our postcolonial
condition. His is a much welcome work of immense relevance to African
studies and deserves serious critical attention." —Chinua Achebe
"These stories reminded me
of Isaac Bashevis Singer, whose memories of a vanished world feel half like
memoir and half like fairy tale. Readers will be charmed by them. They brim
with humanity." —Andrew Solomon, author of the National Book
Award–winning The Noonday Demon
"Mahama’s stories lure the
reader into an unforgettable journey in which he interacts with history as a
living tissue. The characters and the episodes are part of the everyday but one
imbued with magic and suggestive power that go beyond the concrete and the
palpable to hint at history in motion." —Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o, author of Weep
Not, Child
"Warm and engaging. The view
of a complex world in microcosm." —Aminatta Forna, author of the
Commonwealth Book Prize–winning The Memory of Love
"In fluid, unpretentious
style, Mahama unspools Ghana’s recent history via entertaining and enlightening
personal anecdotes."—Publishers Weekly
"Sensitive, honest
autobiographical essays… A wonderfully intimate look at the convulsive changes,
and deep scarring, in post-colonial Africa."—Kirkus Reviews
Tuesday, May 15, 2012
Pure Class: Robert Glasper Experiment
![]() |
| Robert Glasper |
I’ve reviewed Robert Glasper before so I
won’t say much. Except that his latest album, Black
Radio is the best new release to come out since his last one (2009’s Double Booked).
It’s testament to the pianist and his three-man band that they managed to fill the soulless Barbican
Hall with such a complete sound that you could almost forget that you were in the
cavernous space. Playing for close to three hours, it was such an intimate and
transcendent experience that RCDC (or RCDM, in this case) could have played for
another three and no one would have minded. The show was recorded for BBC Radio
3 so check it out when it airs in early June.
Location:
Silk St, City of London, EC2Y, UK
Saturday, May 05, 2012
What’s so disturbing about Coetzee’s Disgrace?
A couple of weeks ago, over a lobbyist-like
lunch in a Commission-crowded coffee shop, my companion remarked: “Every time I
tell friends to read Disgrace, and
they go away and read it, they suddenly stop returning my calls. It’s one of my
favourite books. You’re a literary person. Give it a go.”
So I did and I soon began to
wonder whether I would take said friend’s calls again. Disgrace is indeed a disturbing read - and relentlessly so - but
the way in which Coetzee crafts a taut and compelling narrative makes for an
affecting novel that’s ultimately a work of art.
In just over 200 pages, Disgrace grapples with the big political
issues of race, sex and power in post-apartheid South Africa but not gratuitously
so and not without diffusing the blame. The protagonist, David Lurie is a
repulsive man with few redeeming qualities, a respectable misogynist who sees
women in exclusively sexual terms, including his own daughter. When the
university professor has a relationship with a student, “an affair” which, to
my mind, was begun by rape, he is forced out of his job in disgrace and goes to
stay with his daughter on her smallholding in the veld. The father and
daughter are attacked on the farm and it has devastating consequences that change
both their lives forever.
Coetzee has mastered the art of
saying so much while saying very little. This is how he manages to cram a great
deal into a relatively thin volume. While economical with his prose, he doesn’t
hold back on the moral questions, which are controversial and wide-ranging and
where the uneasiness with Lurie’s character begins for the reader.
Coetzee’s prose is stiflingly
tight and subtle with no room for air. Not a spare word makes it on to the page
which forces the reader to read between the lines and draw his or her own
conclusions about the characters’ motivations.
Which is what makes Disgrace such a challenging read. By
giving the reader just enough (rope), Coetzee challenges him to make assumptions
in the literary world that s/he would not feel comfortable
making in the real world. Consequently, the reader feels
complicit in the depravity of Coetzee’s fictional realm, so engaged is s/he with
the true-to-life characters and situations that they take an emotional toll. He
makes us question our norms, allegiances and values. He makes us question
ourselves.
Well-structured and deftly
executed, Disgrace is a classic, but
it’s not without its flaws. Lurie’s failed obsession with Byron and Teresa is
sometimes an unnecessary and intrusive distraction as is the tendency to rely
on the reader to know a little too much to propel the book along. That said, Disgrace is so deep with dark layers that
on a second reading new interpretations are bound to come to light.
Disgrace is a book that
manages to polarise opinion but that is, undoubtedly, one of its strengths. A couple of weeks later, while
extolling the virtues of the book to
another friend, I mentioned how it made me see South Africa with new eyes.
“Don’t let the views of a white
South African living in Australia put you off going to South Africa,” she said.
“Go and see for yourself.”
End of discussion. I wonder if she’ll take my calls?
Reading other’s work
In the last few months, I’ve been privileged to read the
work of three writers who are aspiring to publication or performance, a
playwright and two non-fiction authors. Each of the works was deeply affecting with
a social conscience and a political message. Long after I had read the last
page I was still thinking about the stories and the issues they raised.
It’s exciting to be there at the birth of nascent but
assured talent, to be in at the beginning of a career. And it’s a mutually
beneficial arrangement.
They get:
- constructive criticism that they can use (or not) to improve their work;
- an impartial eye and an honest tongue;
- someone to bounce ideas off who understands the all-consuming nature of the creative process.
I get:
- great pleasure from reading their work and watching it develop.
- to learn about the world and see things from a new perspective.
- to sharpen my criticism skills and to develop my own network of potential readers of my work.
I know what a huge deal it is to hand over your work - your
baby - for criticism, the manuscript that you’ve spent months, sometimes years,
slaving over, and I feel truly honoured to have been asked for my opinion. Needless
to say, all three writers have now become friends. Over the last three months,
I’ve learned so much from them and about them, and myself, and I look forward
to seeing their work in print and on stage.
Knowledge and entertainment for the price of a burger and a beer
Here is a pic of this weekend’s booty:
- Robert Harris, The Fear Index
- Mirza Waheed, The Collaborator
- Richard Wright, Black Boy
- Athol Fugard, Tsotsi
- Amin Maalouf, The Rock of Tanios
- Chris Abani, The Virgin of Flames
- Diana Evans, 26a
- Dawn Powell, A Time To Be Born
- E. Lynn Harris, And This Too Shall Pass
- E.Lynn Harris, Not A Day Goes By
- Lisa Rogak, Michelle Obama In Her Own Words
A diverse and entertaining haul. And all for the grand total
of €14.75 (or just
over €2 a book); roughly
£12 or $19.50.
I feel an Orwellian Books
vs. Cigarettes essay coming on…
Monday, April 23, 2012
Going global
![]() |
| March-April 2012 issue of Brussels Airlines magazine |
Labels:
Culture,
Talk/Discuss,
Writing
Location:
Brussels, Belgium
Friday, April 20, 2012
Thursday, April 05, 2012
Tuesday, April 03, 2012
Sunday, February 12, 2012
This was Whitney Houston
Monday, February 06, 2012
Music lives: D'Angelo live in London
![]() |
| Pure. artistic. genius: D'Angelo |
It's been over a decade and it proved to be well worth the wait. James Brown, Fela Kuti, Sly Stone, Prince... D'Angelo is back. In a set that lasted just over two hours, D'Angelo grooved through his back catalogue of tunes from his critically acclaimed albums, 1995's Brown Sugar and 2000's wonderfully intense, Voodoo. The Virginia native had the audience wrapped around his finger from the first bar to the last. From the opener, Playa Playa to the album classics, The Root and One Mo Gin ..
The band were tighter than a leg cast. There was no room for improvement. It was like being party to a studio jam session where everything went down in one take, maintaining the looseness of the jam. It's easy to forget that D'Angelo is a musician as well as a vocalist but we were definitely reminded that he is a multi-instrumentalist equally at home on the guitar strings as the piano keys.
An intimate moment came when the band left the stage and D'Angelo was alone with his audience. He went through a medley of hits from Brown Sugar accompanied by the keyboard and the audience.
Sold out and with good reason, we all knew that we were in the presence of greatness and we were witnessing the re-claiming of a crown. The King is back. Long live The King.
Labels:
Music
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Throwback post: The Tunisian revolution in Brussels
15 January, 2011. The morning after the night before. Almost two thousand miles north of Tunis, the capital of Tunisia, bold expressions of solidarity are being made in support of the country’s people. Yesterday, the people succeeded in bringing down a president. Today, revolutionary fervour has erupted in Brussels.
A rowdy contingent is gathered outside Bourse, an historic symbol of Belgian capitalism. The old stock exchange and speaker’s corner is the scene of many a weekend protest. No point being at the Berlaymont when the Eurocrats are away for two days, probably off in their home countries or holed up in the suburbs. Bourse, behind Grand Place and at the heart of Brussels' tourist trade, is the perfect place to draw attention to your cause. And these demonstrators are here to be heard.
“One, Two, Three / Viva La Tunisie!” they intone in full-throated chorus, over and over again, about two hundred of them in unison. Their slogan may not be catchy but it’s powerful nonetheless and everyone on the busy shopping streets surrounding the popular landmark is stopping and taking notice.
***
This isn’t, strictly speaking, a protest. It’s a party. The people are here to celebrate the people’s uprising in their homeland, which has resulted in the downfall of Tunisia’s president of twenty-three years, Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali. They used to call him “Ben A Vie” meaning president for life, an ironic soubriquet for the man who claimed to have won three successive elections, each with over eighty per cent of the vote. Now they call him “Ben A Degagé”, Ben is out and they’re elated.
“I’m here because I’m happy,” beams Mohammed, a middle-aged father of three who’s come from the other side of town to be part of the action. “In the beginning I didn’t believe it, until now. I’m Tunisian and I’ve been in Belgium for thirty years. I saw some things on television that I didn’t like and I want to be here to say that we can be happy now. I hope for good things for Tunisia and Tunisians. Fiesta! Voila!”
The North African sun has finally set on one of the region’s most repressive dictators. After days of protests, the autocrat has been pushed out of power by a surprise revolt that started almost a month ago and gradually gathered pace. It began with the deed of one man who, reduced to selling fruit on the street because there was no other job for him, set fire to himself when he was forbidden from doing even that by police. This incident ignited a series of events that led to the first successful Arab world uprising in thirty-one years. And that is why we’re here.
***
The red and white of the Tunisian standard adds colour to the austere grey of the Bourse. Young men straddle the giant lion sculptures on either side of the imposing neo-classical building, erecting flags. Rodin had a hand in this place. Now they do too.
A large crowd on the steps below excitedly pump placards high in to the air. The Tunisian flags fly alongside Algerian ones, the old enemies united in optimism, and there’s the odd Moroccan one thrown in for good measure. Banners expressing solidarity with the Ivory Coast are waved zealously beside Che Guevara motifs. The local socialists have also infiltrated the party, handing out leaflets proclaiming the imminent fall of capitalism. Revolution is in the air.
***
If this is supposed to be a party it doesn’t feel like it. Emotions are high yet, amid the jubilation, there’s a bristling tension. “Saudi government, shame on you! Fuck you and your oil. Bastards!” spits one man, aggressively jabbing his finger in the air. Along with their relief at Ben Ali’s exit, there’s resentment as to why they’ve had to endure years of despotic rule while the West stood idly by as the situation in Tunisia was allowed to deteriorate.
“L’Europe etait complice du dictateur,” reads a sign and its bearer is in no doubt as to who’s to blame for Tunisia’s agony. The man with the condemnatory placard is fulminating against the European and American governments: Ben Ali is guilty of murder, repression and corruption, he says, and the West is guilty of turning a blind eye to it. His invective is so boisterously impassioned that people begin to move away from him, creating a space for his imaginary soapbox as he expounds his theory using every part of his body. He charges the West with being complicit in the suffering of the Tunisian people for their own gain. It’s the same story, just a different state.
***
Because of Ben Ali’s support to the West as a bulwark against Islamic extremism, and his cosy relationship with various European leaders, his heavy-handed rule has long been tolerated. France, Tunisia’s former colonial power, even threatened to send troops to Tunis to help restore order. For the West, it’s been a case of better the devil you know. Not so for the Tunisian people, who’ve been sacrificed in the process, considered collateral damage in the war against terror, like the innocent Pakistanis killed while they slept in drone attacks or the Afghan civilians cut down on the street by misguided bombs.
“Memoir a nos martyrs de la liberté”. Those who have died, like Muhammad Bouazizi, the self-immolator, and the dozens of others killed in the days of rioting, are considered freedom fighters here. Their deeds have made them martyrs. “Power to the people”. “Ben Ali doit payer pour ses crimes”. “Arretez le massacre”. “Dignité, egalitié, paix pour la Tunisie”. The demands, declarations and accusations by way of banners and placards keep on coming. They’re written in French, Dutch, Arabic and English. This is, after all, an officially bilingual, international city, the capital of Europe, and they feel - they hope - that Europe, if not the world is watching. But, whatever the language, the message is the same: We’ve suffered enough. This is our time. Carpe diem.
***
Like their compatriots in Tunis and other towns and cities around Tunisia, most of those here celebrating are young men in their twenties, some Belgian-born-and-raised, others more recent arrivals. There are also a decent number of women and older people in the throng, whole families - fathers lift small children on their shoulders so they too can bear witness - as well as non-Tunisians of various backgrounds. They’ve all come to share in the moment, to watch history in the making.
“I live here in Belgium,” says Ali, a man in his late thirties, in strained but perfect English. “Unfortunately.”
He’s holding aloft a double-sided placard which reads: I call all Arab nations to get rid of their dictators on one side and Yes We Can Too on the other. Both sides declare: I’m proud and Tunisian so that no one is in any doubt.
“Why unfortunately?” I ask.
“Because I wanted to be there,” he says. “This is my way of expressing solidarity.” And without missing a beat he insists: “And I’m ready to die for it.”
When someone looks you in the eye and tells you with complete conviction that they're ready to die for their country, you don’t flinch, so unnerved are you by their devotion. There are a million questions you want to ask but none make themselves available. You begin to see the person in a different light. All of a sudden, he becomes more real, not just another stranger but an actual human being with a past and a present. His future becomes questionable. He becomes vulnerable. So do you. You realise that he could be your brother or your cousin and you feel protective of him. You empathise with his wanting to be at home and yet having to be far from it, desperate to play a part in shaping his country's future. You feel it about Britain, in the wake of some of the severest cuts that the country has experienced in a generation, and I feel it about Ghana, always.
“I want to talk to the people of the Arab world because the Arab leaders are all stupid and dictators,” Ali says. “I want them to have a revolution and show all the leaders that we are stronger than them.”
There’s something completely sincere about Ali, and something wholly naive. He looks an anguished man. His lips speak of revolt and his eyes convey suffering. Though this is the first time I’ve met him, and it will probably be the last, he begins to mean something to me. Something in him reflects something in me. I feel I know his struggle. I identify with his frustration. Maybe it’s the Africa connection.
My mind wanders back to what it must have been like in Africa at the dawn of independence, when sweeping change was on the horizon and the anticipation was so high it was electric. There was no knowing what the future would bring but that was half the excitement, the unfolding of events. It makes you think about the cost of freedom and those willing to pay its price. Perhaps you would give your life for your family or even a good friend but for the men and women you don't know, many of whom are yet to be born? These are the revolutionaries, the sacrificial lambs. It’s in their hands that the future lies.
Most of the protestors know that, while they’ve come to the end of a long battle, they’re just at the beginning of another, one of uncertainty but not fear because this time, at least, they’re in control of their own destiny. “Ben Ali has been the “president” of Tunisia but actually he’s a dictator and he’s been oppressing people for over three decades and now finally he’s gone,” says Ben, a twenty-year-old Belgian-born Tunisian while hastily handing me a sign to wave. “But we don’t know what’s going to happen next,” he admits. “The most important thing is that he’s gone.” He pauses briefly to think about what he’s said and, with more than a hint of caution, adds on reflection, “For now.”
And that’s all they have – “for now”. How long is now only time will tell. For the moment, there’s unbridled happiness that will soon be tempered by cautious optimism. But that, like all killjoys, can wait until the morning.
Labels:
Current Affairs,
Europe,
Writing
Location:
Bourse, 1000 City of Brussels, Belgium
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)













